Code Name Verity





Becky - hadn't remembered to pick a book, so when she saw the great reviews online, she chose it. Laughed to herself when she thought of how Sandy must be enjoying it. Becky liked how the story wove literature into the plot and how Maddie and Julie bonded. She knew Julie was trying to get information out to someone, but didn't know to whom. She considered it YA fiction because the plot was plausible, but not likely.  Since Julie was trying to stay alive by writing, her part of the story was bogged down in details, but it picked up in the second half. She didn't see Julie's death coming. She found the WWII details interesting, such as uses for kerosene, and the origin of ball point pens. She liked the Peter Pan references.  

Pat - like almost everyone else I thought the first part dragged and the second picked up quite a bit. I found Julie's story of what was happening to her in France much more interesting than what she was writing for Von Linden. I had a hard time with how both characters got their story across. Neither seemed realistic. Julie would have been shot for writing a novel and Maddie wouldn't have risked everyone's lives by writing either. But like Letitia said, fiction doesn't have to be completely believable. And once I accepted that, I began to enjoy it a lot more.

Carolyn - had a hard time getting started with this and thought she'd never get through it She was surprised by how much everyone liked it online.She wondered if she read it a second time through if she could decode the underlined parts and see all the intricate plot connections. She thought she should be feeling sorry for the characters, but didn't, and was confused as to the switched ID between Julie and Maddie. Carolyn didn't take any notes which made her realize she had just been reading without making any connections. She found the French Resistance fighters very brave and thought the second half of the book was better and less confusing than the first. 

Miles - felt bad to say this, but the book didn't really start for him until the French girl got her head chopped off. Until the guillotine, it seemed too YA. The story earned three or four points right there. Miles liked the characters and their friendship, but he found how much they knew about each other incredulous. He wondered if Julie really was a German spy, and was blown away by her death, expecting a pat rescue ending. He found the plot line clever even though it took over half the book to set it up. 

Michelle - had to really focus and concentrate to keep things straight. She had no trouble with the two main characters, but towards middle got tired of going back and forth between the two narratives Julie was writing. During the second half she couldn't wait to read it. She found Julie funny and witty and recalled her description of being like an upside down tortoise when knocked over tied up in her chair. She liked how Julie gave glimpses of Von Linden's humanity, and thought both girls were tough smart women who never would have become friends if not for the war. She found herself thinking a lot about this story which is one of the reasons she rated so high and thinks she would have to read it twice to get it all.

Artie - also thought the first half slogged and that the second half moved along in part because it revealed what Queenie was really doing, which he found very interesting and clever. The characters were believable and likely not far from the truth in regards to people rising to whatever the circumstances of the war demanded. He thought the author did a good job giving both characters, who were strong women in peril, two separate writing styles. Artie found the author's notes at the end bothersome and unnecessary. The piece stood by itself and didn't need her rationale. 

Letitia - loved the first part. She didn't think it was plausible but fiction does not have to be totally believable. She was a bit disturbed with how much she found herself laughing, and thought it was almost too funny at times. She was very entertained yet often horrified which made her wonder what distinguishes a YA from an adult novel. More torture described for adult? She loved Queenie's voice and believed Maddie to be dead until the second half. She thought the second half was beyond imagination and was blown away by its twists. The author impressed her. She felt for the characters, was moved by the book and found it a clever, entertaining read that she would highly recommend.  

K'Lynn - got this in the Teen section of her library and was told by the librarian that she was lucky to find a copy, so she had very high expectations, which she admitted might have biased her opinion. She thought it was an original, well-written story, but Verity's voice annoyed her from the beginning. Her top ten list of fears that included dates and lip gloss seemed so petty that by the time her transition occurred, K'Lynn didn't care about her character. She often asked herself, Really? Really, would that happen? And she asked herself this question so much she was unable to reconcile the book as a whole. 

Maggie - read this whilst poolside in Cabo, which was just one of the advantages she had, hence my use of the British 'whilst'.  It's an English book by an English author, and she knew all the places that were mentioned in England and could picture them very well. Queenie's voice also bothered her (she referred to it as Jolly Hockeysticks) until she learned that Julie was from a privileged background, then it was more acceptable. Maggie also wondered if we'd find out that Julie was really a spy. Something told her that Julie wasn't a coward. Kiss me Hardy were Nelson's last words, and are very famous. Would it be fair to compare them to the American, Remember the Alamo? Nelson is a huge historical figure in England, and every Brit would be familiar with him (see Trafalgar Square). A comrade of Nelson's is buried in the tiny village Maggie grew up in and every year there's a big ceremony commemorating his death. Maggie cried when she read Julie's mother's letter to Maddie. 

Sandy - rated this a 4 and shared her formula:
  • 1 Point for finishing the story
  • 2 Points for Julie's death
  • -2 points for repeating part 1 in part 2
  • 2 points for Julie's mother's letter which made for the most perfect ending ever
  • 1 point for liking Becky
Sandy knew the underlined parts meant something, but by the time the code was revealed she didn't care. Von Linden would have blown Julie away with how she drug the story out.  Come on, let's get on with it! Sandy thought both characters had the same voice, except that Maddie cried a lot and Julie was a blonde. She counted nine uses of Easy Peasy, and felt like we're supposed to be blown away by the fact that there were women pilots. The Peter Pan references: Oh My God I don't care! She doesn't like mysteries and thinks that pieces of the puzzle are revealed whenever the plot gets weak. 


Comments

Pat Kutkey said…
I INCLUDED LETITIA'S EMAIL AS A COMMENT HERE TO KEEP THE THREAD.

On Nov 12, 2013, at 7:35 AM, Letitia wrote:

This morning I could not sleep and I kept on thinking of points of the book that were notable to me and that I failed to bring up. Some were mentioned by others,
but I feel merit more attention:

-The explanation of the American’s interview and all the information Verity/Julie was able to impart. So clever!
-The way people help others with no expectation of a favor returned, especially meaningful when lives are being risked. She referred to this several times in the book.
-The incredible bravery of the characters involved.
-Learning about some of the feats and heroic efforts of the French Resistance
-The complex character of Von Linden and how he had the sensitivity to love poetry
and literature, yet callous to torture and killing.
-The author’s notes and her explanation of how important historical accuracy was to
her. Even though this was fictional, many of the things she described could have
happened, or similar things did occur.
-This book kept me thinking and continues to keep me thinking. I loved the way the second half unfolds and puts a completely different spin on the first half.

Great pick Becky!!
Pat Kutkey said…
AND HERE IS BECKY'S REPLY

After reading your thoughts thought I'd forward this this email that my mom sent yesterday. It's very moving if you have a few minutes to watch and listen to it.

Becky


The Silence

A few years ago, a friend visited the Netherlands American Cemetery and Memorial in the village of Margraten, about six miles from Maastricht. There lie buried 8,301
American soldiers killed in the battles to liberate Holland in the fall and winter of 1944-5. Sgt. Bill Dukeman, 101st Airborne Division, 506th Parachute Infantry
Regiment, Second Battalion, Company C (of "Band of Brothers fame) is buried there. He was killed in the battle of "The Crossroads" in northern Holland.

The Dutch hold an annual memorial concert every September at the above named cemetery to remember and honor the Americans who died to free them in Operation Market Garden and subsequent efforts to eject the German army from Holland. Sgt. Dukeman, like many other fallen GIs, was "adopted" by a Dutchfamily. Dukeman's family in the States was contacted and hosted in Holland, and his grave site decorated each year by his Dutch "family." They keep his portrait in their home, displayed in a place of honor. Fathers pass this obligation down to their sons in Holland.

This version of the original "taps" music is played by a 13 year old Dutch girl named Melissa Venema. The conductor of the orchestra is Andre Rieu from Holland.

Many of you may never have heard taps played in its entirety. The original ver sionof Taps was called Last Post, and was written by Daniel Butterfield in 1801. It was rather lengthy and formal, as you will hear in this clip, so in 1862 it was shortened to 24 notes and re-named Taps.

Melissa Venema is playing it on a trumpet whereby the original was played on a bugle.

Watch at this site, and go full screen.

http://www.flixxy.com/trumpet-solo-melissa-venema.htm
Kath O. said…
Hey All –
I really enjoyed this book and didn’t notice it dragging in the first part until it sped up in the second part. I’m generally a very literal reader and while I noticed the underlining of text in Julie’s story it didn’t really occur to me that she was trying to get a message out to anyone. Her character did a good job of being a bit ditzy so I underestimated her (as I’m sure was her point). I initially thought Julie was dead when the first half ended and was then a little shocked when she was killed. I found it a very clever and interesting read.

While I agree there were many actions and situations that seemed unrealistic, they did not detract from the story for me. It’s interesting to me to think of the great many ordinary people doing extraordinary and noble things during this war (like the French Resistance fighters), and also the same way ordinary people (like Thibaut) could commit horrendous acts under the ordinary rationalization of their jobs. How would I react under these same circumstances of invasion? I would hope nobly but it is hard to really say.

Also, Beck, thanks for the article and taps link from your Mom – always makes me cry and this was a beautiful performance.
Kath O. said…
Random thing but coincidentally on Humans of New York today: http://www.humansofnewyork.com/post/67568148918/my-parents-had-sent-me-to-a-small-village-outside

Also, btw, Pat, you do such a good job with the notes I can hear Sandy's (and everyone else's) voice in my head. :)